HRMN 408 Assignment2- RecruitmentExercise       !!!NEED DONE BY TOMORROW!!!  6-8PM EST TIME   Theaimofthisexerciseis torespondto directionsfromyouremployertodesign arecruitmentexercisethathopefullywillincreasethediversityofacity departmentwhilec

profileCahplleleelpe7

 

HRMN 408 Assignment2- RecruitmentExercise

 

 

 

!!!NEED DONE BY TOMORROW!!!  6-8PM EST TIME

 

Theaimofthisexerciseis torespondto directionsfromyouremployertodesign arecruitmentexercisethathopefullywillincreasethediversityofacity departmentwhilecomplying withfederallawsconcerningemployment discriminationandfairrecruitment/testingmethods.

 

 

 

Youworkinthepublicsector.Specifically,youworkinHRforamedium-sized cityofapproximately1millionpeople.  Approximately30%ofthecity’sresidents areracialor ethnic minorities,withasignificant proportionofAfrican-American andHispanicresidents.

 

Atpresentthereareapproximately900firefightersemployedbythecity;afull complementof firefighterswould be1000firefighters.

 

 

 

Thecitywantstorecruitapproximately100additionalfirefighters.  Atthe presenttime,thefiredepartmentisoverwhelminglywhite(andmale).  Many of thecurrentfirefightersarethesonsandnephewsof formeror currentfire fighters.

 

 

 

Inthepast,potentialrecruitstothefiredepartmentlearnedofthecivilservice examsthroughwordof mouth fromrelativeswhoworkedforthefire department;someofthemhadaccesstoa‘bank’ of formerexamquestionsthat hadbeencollectedandstoredat firestations.

 

 

 

Theentryexamforthefiredepartmentinthepastconsistedofaseriesofessay questions,posing hypotheticalquestionsthatafirefightermightencounterina fire.  High-rankingofficersinthefiredepartmentdesignedthequestions.

 

 

 

Applicantswererankedaccordingtotheirscores ontheexamandaspositions becameavailableapplicantswereappointedintheorderin whichtheywere rankedonthetest.Aminimumscorewasrequiredtobeplacedonthelistfrom whichappointmentsweremade.

 

 

 

Generallyspeaking,whileapproximately25%ofnon-minoritycandidatesscored wellenoughto beplacedonacivilservicelistfromwhichappointmentswould be made,andhadagoodchanceof beingappointed,onlyapproximately10%of minoritycandidatesscoredwellenoughtopass’theexam,andwerenotplaced onthehiringlist.

 

 

 

TheFireCommissionwouldliketoincreaseminorityrepresentationintheranks oftheFireDepartment,if possible.  TheCommissionhasaskedthecityHR departmentforwhichyouworkto designarecruitmentcampaignandsuggestan entranceexamthatmightachieveitsgoalsofincreasingminorityrepresentation inthefiredepartment.

 

 

 

Yourassignmentis towriteamemorandumtotheFireCommissionabout recruitmentpracticesoftheFireDepartmentandtosuggestwaystoachievethe Commission’sdesiredgoals.Inanyevent,youwishtoavoidlitigationoverthe

 

testresultsandbeableto defendtheresultsoftheentranceexam,evenifit failed

 

toachievethecity’sgoalofincreasingminorityhiring.

 

 

 

Inyourmemorandum,youshouldcoverthefollowingpoints:

 

 

 

CritiquethepastrecruitmentpracticesoftheFireDepartmentinlightof what youknowaboutthelegalprinciples of discrimination,particularlythedifferent theoriesofracediscriminationunderTitleVII.  Animportantresourcewould be EEOCguidelinesonracediscrimination

 

 

 

http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/race-color.html

 

 

 

http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/race-color.html

 

 

 

Importantcaseswould beGriggsv.DukePower,

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/401/424

 

 

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/401/424

 

 

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/411/792

 

 

 

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/411/792

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wouldyourecommendfollowingthesamerecruitmentpracticesofthepast(e.g., word-of-mouthrecruitment,essay-basedexamquestions)?Whyor whynot?

 

 

 

Whatwouldyousuggestintherecruitmentcampaignyouhavebeenaskedto helpdesign?  Whatspecificrecruitmenttechniquesmightincreasethediversity ofthepoolofapplicants?

 

 

 

Thereis apossibilitythatdespiteyourbesteffortstoavoidadverseimpact,the assessmentmethodsmightproducearesultin which minoritiesachievedlessthan

 

80%ofthepassrateof non-minorities.Whatadvice wouldyougiveinadvanceto avoidapotentiallysuccessfullawsuitchallengingtheresults oftheexamination? Animportantcasewould beRicciv.DeStefano

 

 

 

Youcanusetheabovepointstostructureyourmemorandum,butbesureto considerandaddressthefollowingissues,whichareimplicitintheexercise:

 

 

 

Describetheconceptsof disparatetreatmentanddisparateimpactliabilityunder TitleVII,andanalyzewhythepreviousrecruitment/testing methodsmight violateTitleVII.

 

Discusswhatstepsyouwouldtakeinanefforttoincreasethepoolof minority applicantsand,hopefully,avoidalowerpassrateforminoritycandidates.

 

 

 

Discusswhatadviceyouwouldgiveinadvanceaboutbeingableto defendyour recruitment/testingevenif minoritiesfailto achieveapassratethatis at least

 

80%of non-minoritycandidates.ReadtheRiccicasecarefullyanddiscussthe

 

wisdomof usingtest-developmentexperts.Canyoulocateawebsiteforatest- developmentexpertbusinessanddescribewhattheywoulddo?

 

 

 

Be sure to use outside sources to support your themes as assertions in your paper.

 

 

 

Theformatforthisassignmentshould beamemorandumtotheFire Commission,usingparagraphsandcompletesentences.Yourpaperwillbe gradedaccordingtothefollowingrubric.

 

 

 

Yourassignmentwillbegradedaccordingtothefollowingrubric:

 

 

 

       

 

 

Criteria

 

Excellent

 

Good

 

Fair

 

Poor

 

Does not meet requirements

 

Addresses all Assignment Components

5 points

Follows directions to the letter and addresses all parts, thoroughly and completely. 

4 points

Shows command of the facts and law but does not follow directions clearly or completely. Includes majority or all of necessary elements but not all are complete and clear

3 points

Fails to address one or more of the required topics

2 points

Ignores directions as to requested form. 

0 points

Missing.

 

 

Skill in Writing

15 points

High level of sophistication and depth of thought. Carefully delineates and analyzes all of the relevant law and facts. 

13 points

Lists all the most relevant facts and law, but treats them in a cursory manner. Shows some depth of analysis.  

9 points

Omits relevant facts/law or places emphasis on less relevant items.  Discussion/analysis is not very detailed or in depth

5 points

Covers only a portion of the important laws and/or facts in reaching a conclusion.

0 points

Missing. Content does not demonstrate an attempt to perform and analysis or provide deep thought. 

 

Grammar, mechanics, and APA

5 points

No errors; well presented structure. Good/appropriate use of references.

4 points

A few minor spelling/grammatical errors. Good/appropriate use of references.

3 points

Some issues with errors cause lack of clarity and/or limited use of appropriate references causes the paper to lack some credibility. 

2 points

Errors in paper create difficulty in understanding the paper. Little to no use of appropriate references. 

0 points

The paper cannot be read due to numerous errors and mistakes. No use of appropriate references. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    • 10 years ago
    • 20
    Answer(0)